One state one vote - yes but one vote of many , not a veto. Your system would have left Kosovo to carry on killing as in shrevenitza . The inspectors in Syria are not being allowed to go to Duma, no doubt so Russia can clean up the evidence .
Ok . Pull up the ladder Jack, we’re OK? We , France and the US have the capability , and someone surely has to deter Chemical, banned, weapons. We can’t stop conventional weapons but unless chemical ones are resisted, they will become “normal” . Are you suggesting we should stand idly by. How about Kosovo, was that wrong - should we have left well alone? We clearly are not a leading world power any more but surely we still have a conscience?
It worry's me some time that that if any problems occur that it is usually left to USA,Uk and maybe France to retaliate.
What makes the UK so eager to jump in first every time.
When asked today why the UK was so quick to do what the USA wanted the PM answered we are our own country and we do not let the USA tell us what to do. or words to that affect. If that is so would the UK have gone itself and bombed Syria. I don't think so.
And once again she uttered, it was most likely it was Syria that dropped the chemical weapons and we have proof. If she had proof why did she say most likely.
Is it time maybe for the UK to sit out on some of those problems and let other countries do their bit.