Something For the Weekend

  STREETWORK 05:56 15 Sep 2006

Mad rush for booster seats for the little un...

Convince partner that football is actually more important than a visit to Tescos...

  1minute 10:36 15 Sep 2006

£500 Fine if you break it!

  Cannuck 10:40 15 Sep 2006

BBC 24 News just said it is a £30.00 on the spot fine.
I guess they'll nail them as often as they nail mobile phone users, ha ha.


  1minute 10:43 15 Sep 2006

On GM-TV they said it was £500?

  Cannuck 10:52 15 Sep 2006

I guess the left don't know what the right is saying.

Like I said, they'll probably pursue it as strongly as mobile phone users


  1minute 10:54 15 Sep 2006

Seems the Police will not becoming down hard on until for 3 months, a period of grace until they then follow the letter of the law.

  Colin 11:26 15 Sep 2006

I see that emergency journeys are exempt. Who clarifies that? I'm sure a lot of people remember "Clunk Click, Every Trip" in the early 70's. There were examples of people being involved in serious accidents without wearing a seat belt when they were just driving to the local shops. An accident can happen in a 100 yard drive just as it can in a 100 mile drive. This is where the law falls down. It must apply all the time or not at all.

  BRYNIT 12:23 15 Sep 2006

To help you understand the requirements. click here

A small section

Where seat belts fitted, correct child restraint MUST be used

MUST use adult belt if the correct child restraint is not available in three scenarios:

1 in a in a licensed taxi or private hire vehicle ;

2 for a short distance for reason of unexpected necessity;

3 two occupied child restraints prevent fitment of a third.

In addition, a child 3 and over may travel unrestrained in the rear seat of a vehicle if seat belts are not available

  Legolas 12:47 15 Sep 2006

Colin, The law states that unexpected journeys are exempt ie if a parent turns up at school to collect their kid/kids and little Johnnie or Jemma is left without a lift because their parent forgot (or some other reason) to collect them then they can travel in a car without the booster seat because it is an unexpected neccessity. Better than leaving the child stranded I think. Of course this is open to abuse but that is the way of the world methinks.

  Colin 11:29 16 Sep 2006

Using the same logic, I could pick my son up on a motorbike if I forgot his helmet, if it otherwise meant not being able to bring him home from school. The only point I'm making is that straight away the law is woolly.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Honor 9 Lite review

HomePod review

Les meilleurs logiciels de montage vidéo gratuits (2018)