Windows XP Service Pack 2

  Pat.B 12:33 07 May 2005

I'm currently using Norton anti virus 2005 and personal firewall. Do I need SP2 as well, and is it likely to conflict with them?

  pcgal 12:49 07 May 2005

I run the same as you with sp2 with no problems.

I do turn the new windows firewall off though(built into sp2)

If your computers running fine then my advice would be to leave sp2 alone.

You have a firewall so your security should be pretty good already.

  Diodorus Siculus 12:50 07 May 2005

SP2 is more valuable than Norton in my opinion. Check the symantec site for any details of possible conflicts, but I should not be concerned.

  pcgal 12:52 07 May 2005

More valuable than Norton !! sp2 doesnt guard against viruses and the windows firewall is pretty lame according to many reports

  Diodorus Siculus 12:59 07 May 2005

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that it should be used without Norton (or other form of protection) only that if there were a chance of conflict, I would install SP2 and find an alternative to Norton.

  selfbuild 13:01 07 May 2005

And what about all the security fixes in SP2 pcgal?

They don't release these service packs and security patches because someone is bored.....

  pcgal 13:17 07 May 2005

selfbuild for your information many companies including IBM have not yet rolled out sp2 into their computer infrastructures.

Its not the end of the world for a home user not to have sp2 installed.

A computer without sp2 will not go into meltdown.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Dell XPS 13 9370 (2018) review

Creative studio Omnibus' brand identity for We Said Enough, a non-profit against sexual misconduct

What to ask Siri on the HomePod

Meilleurs VPN (2018)