Spelling and grammar

  spikeychris 20:49 22 Sep 2003

Lots of posts moaning about how posts are worded so >>

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are at the rghit pcelas. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

  Jomi 20:51 22 Sep 2003
  graham√ 21:00 22 Sep 2003

thy doo sy faltery is the btr part ...

  spikeychris 21:03 22 Sep 2003

Just received it by mail ...whoops

  pinka 21:48 22 Sep 2003

i thought that was good

  Forum Editor 23:50 22 Sep 2003

that when reading rapidly we look at the 'shape' of the word, and that's why lots of people miss typos when they're writing largish blocks of text.

An editor, reading the text for the first time, isn't so familiar with the content so he/she reads more slowly, and with greater attention to word construction - so he/she should spot typos quite easily.

  -pops- 06:53 23 Sep 2003

This refers to spelling only. The situation with poor grammar and faulty or missing punctuation is that the entire meaning of text can be changed by a word in the wrong place (whether or not it is spelled correctly) or, similarly, by a punctuation mark (; : . , et cetera) being wrongly placed or omitted.

  Stuartli 08:46 23 Sep 2003

It's very difficult to spot literals/errors/grammatical mistakes in your own typing - that's why there are proof readers, sub-editors etc.

  Belatucadrus 11:45 23 Sep 2003

click here if you need somebody to do your scrambling for you.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Moto G6 Play Review: First Look

iPad 9.7in (2018) review

Comment utiliser Live Photos ?