pentium 4 v amd

  sopwith 10:00 26 Sep 2003

what is the equivqlent amd proccesor to the pentium 4 2.66 in performance

  MAJ 10:12 26 Sep 2003

In performance it's the Athlon XP 2600+ or Athlon XP 2700+.

In clock speed, I don't think AMD have a 2.66MHz processor.

  kingkenny 12:13 26 Sep 2003

this debate isn't coming around again is it?

  choffe 12:36 26 Sep 2003

i remember starting this nutshell once or twice in other forums..

AMD. i broke 3 of them due to poor heat solutions
P4 i broke one of them due to temper..( they don't bounce well do they?)

amd. depends on fsb and motherboard. 1800's used to run at around 1.5 gig bit strange that they never came out and said this is an AMD 1.5 gig
and under the same process i'd emagine AMD 2800 would run at around 2.4 gig, not that this is a true measure of ability, bench test scores seem to come out favourably towards AMD when vetted against P4 on the 533 fsb, but now the 800fsb is around, we should see a large step between the two rivals.. or so they would have us believe.

this will all come down to the user and what he/she will use the system for.
for graphics and all things that create heat. eg games dvd burning and ghaphic rendering i would plum for p4 on the 2.66
but for office, internet, tasking and lots of noise i think AMD 2400 or above will make you smile just remember to get an exhaust and some furry dice..

  GuyR 15:33 26 Sep 2003

In the dabs magazine advert they give the actual frequency of the AMD chips as follows

1700 = 1.47
1800 = 1.53
2000 = 1.67
2100 = 1.73
2200 = 1.8
2400 = 2.0
2600 = 2.08
2700 = 2.17
2500, 512k, 333mhz = 1.83
2800, 512, 333mhz = 2.08
3000, 512, 333mhz = 2.25

but as discussed it's more than just frequency to be considered.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Samsung Galaxy S9 review

Explore Milton Glaser's iconic poster designs from the 1960s to present, including Bob Dylan, I…

What to expect at Apple's 27 March education event

Idées cadeaux pour geeks et tech addicts