and I'm not the person to provide you with a definitive answer, but I think you've made a few errors yourself Nixx, and perhaps you'll allow me to address a couple of tiny points.
1. I invite you to tell me why PC Advisor would conceivably want to be "biased in reviews"
2. Text files are printed by the million nowdays but this comparison review was on dedicated photo printers (note the word 'photo' there Nixx), and so naturally the main point of the review was to compare image-printing.
3. You don't say what the 'errors' in the test comparison chart are - perhaps you'll point them out?
We think we've provided you with a 'proper' review Nixx - the HP machine was streets ahead of the competition when it came to printing photos, and we think that's what purchasers of photo-printers are primarily interested in. That, plus the fact that the HP machine printed colour files cheaper than any of the other machines.......Oh yes, and the image quality was better than any of the others too.