Lordy! I think not...

  Quickbeam 15:38 18 Nov 2009

click here
At least some people have common sense these days, you could never have any credibility at an Ashes test in 'The MacDonalds Cricket suoerbowl'... could one?

  wiz-king 15:53 18 Nov 2009

How about 'The National Coal Board Homefire Stadium' that would be OK for the Ashes.

  dagbladet 16:08 18 Nov 2009

I'm not sure that this particularly represents "common sense".

Commercial sponsorship has become part and parcel of sport these days. If it was a choice of my club (Gillingham FC) going out of business or the ground being re-named the Poundshop Priestfield Stadium (I tried to keep it realistic) I'd go for survival every time. The ground is currently sponsored by a local Building Society, but frankly no-one ever refers to it as the KRBS. The Emirates is a grand name for a grand stadium. What's the fuss?

  Kevscar1 16:18 18 Nov 2009

7000 new seats but 10 years to build. I take it everything will be done by hand. No power tools or cranes etc.

  tullie 16:21 18 Nov 2009

Personely i couldent care less what a stadiums called.

  dagbladet 11:37 19 Nov 2009

"7000 new seats but 10 years to build. I take it everything will be done by hand."

At that rate of progress my missus assumes that I am carrying out the work.

  Quickbeam 15:48 19 Nov 2009

The dagbladet stadium... No, that doesn't work for me.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Galaxy Note 8 vs iPhone X

Awful clip art from 1994 is being tweeted every hour by a bot

How to update iOS on iPhone or iPad

Les meilleures applications pour enfants 2017