IBM takes the lead.

  LastChip 23:49 06 Oct 2004

IBM has built a super-computer that is the fastest in the world. It can calculate 36.01 teraflops per second (36.01 trillion calculations per second), bypassing the long standing record holder, NEC's Earth Simulator (35.86 teraflops).

It is noteworthy not only due to it's speed record, but also as it is only one hundredth of the size of NEC's machine and consumes only one twenty-eighth of the power per computation.

However, I would not wish to pay the electricity bill; it has 16,000 processors to feed!

  Danoh 08:26 08 Oct 2004

is a bit of a wait for dinner. :-)

Unless you're on human timescales which at 1/36 trillionth of a second is nothing to fret about.

  LastChip 23:39 27 Oct 2004

Announced today, an SGI built super-computer, reached an amazing 51.9 teraflops and peeked at 61T.

This incredible machine click here is destined for NASA.

  LastChip 18:17 10 Nov 2004

IBM has grabbed the lead back with it's BlueGene/L machine, smashing the previous record. It peaked at 70.2 teraflops (makes my 1.9GB machine seem like a stone age relic!). NASA's Columbia, is now in second place with a creditable 51.87TF and using only 10,240 Intel chips.

This creates an enviable lead for the USA, with both first and second places in the world.

When this monster is completed in 2005, it is estimated it will perform at around 200TF, using 32,768 modified IBM chips.

  Danoh 19:28 10 Nov 2004

Thanks for keeping us updated, LastChip!!

  LastChip 22:47 25 Mar 2005

IBM's Blue Gene hits an amazing 135.5 teraflops (trillions per second) by doubling the number of racks to 32. Each rack contains 1024 dual core chips, so by my reckoning, it's using 32,768 dual core processors. It is claimed that by the end of its development, scheduled for this year, the size will double again, with an expected 270 teraflops speed.

If you're interested, you can buy one for around $2 million per rack!

  jz 11:46 26 Mar 2005

So, how long would it take to crack my 128-bit encrypted on-line payment transactions, I wonder, on the IBM with its 135.5 teraflops? I suspect it may still be centuries (but probably much quicker to crack it through the password).

Another question: how many gigaflops can the latest Intel and the latest AMD processors destined for PC use achieve? Presumbably, the AMD gives a better score relative to its clock frequency than the Intel.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

OnePlus 5T review: Hands-on

Illustrator Andrés Lozano on his improv line work, brazen use of colours & hand sketching

iPhone X review

Comment envoyer gratuitement des gros fichiers ?