"We want to establish what constitutes a menacing communication, what should be the level of intent required for the offence to be committed, and whether or not Paul's message was sent by means of a public electronic communications network," said David Allen Green, his solicitor
I recommend that David Allen Green reads his client's Tweet, which went like this:
"Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week to get your shit together, otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!"
Just how menacing does a communication need to be before it's illegal? As for whether Twitter is a "public electronic communications network" I'm rather lost for words - unlike David Allen Green's client, it seems.