Is the following grammatically correct?"They would be boasting about it if they had done it"It's the "had" that I'm not sure about.
Yes it should beGrammar question.
I always use the rule that if it sounds OK when you say it, then it's correct as far as most people are concerned.In your case "They'd be boasting about it if they'd done it" would be the way most people would say the sentence, which is just a contraction of your original sentence.Interesting how "they'd" is a contraction of both "they would" and "they had", but both different meanings are apparent to the listener...
"They would have been boasting about it had they done it" seems to read a little better to me. Having wrote that I must point out English was not a lesson I generally kept wide-awake in ;o)
Since they had not done it, the statement is hypothetical and thus requires the subjunctive. An elegant form demonstrating the subjunctive would be "Were they to have done it they would be boasting".
I really do feel sorry for foreigners trying to learn English!
I used to, until my partner started trying to teach me Polish, now I feel sorry for Polish people who have to learn Polish!!
And what did they not do that they would have been bragging about anyway, had they done it?Just curious ;o)
When I saw the heading to this thread, I thought we were going to get a spelling lesson too.
Probably just a way of getting our attention?
As I read the sentence, it did not seem correct and thus I began to try to reformulate it. Then I read natdoor’s solution.Wonderful!My only thought is: should there not be a comma between “it” and “they”?"Were they to have done it, they would be boasting".I am often troubled by the “silent” comma in sentences, this being a perfect example.Skeletal
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.
Galaxy Note 8 vs iPhone X
The secrets of creating gory VFX
How to update iOS on iPhone or iPad
WhatsApp : comment lire vos messages sans que l’expéditeur le sache
© Copyright 2017 IDG UK. All Rights Reserved.