EU blocks low-duty alcohol online

  Sethhaniel 09:36 23 Nov 2006
Locked
  Rigor mortis 10:00 23 Nov 2006

Probably an unpopular decision with sections of the populace but the government would have taxed something else to make up the shortfall.
Tax and death are unavoidable as someone said.

  GANDALF <|:-)> 10:37 23 Nov 2006

No surprise there then.

G

  hijo 11:41 23 Nov 2006

this is why gordon brown wont be getting my support...!!
yet again the english people have to pay more TAX....!!!

  dagbladet 12:16 23 Nov 2006

Oh thank goodness it's just the English that are charged. Tax and duty free for the Jocks/Paddys/Taffs then?

  spuds 12:29 23 Nov 2006

With Gandalf on this one- No surprise there then.

Even Mystic Meg had a good chance at making that prediction :O)

  Sethhaniel 13:20 23 Nov 2006

it was taking the empties back that got me ;)

  DrScott 21:16 23 Nov 2006

the European Union essentially taking £16 billion from the UK treasury...

It was always going to go Gordon's way.

  Jak_1 21:25 23 Nov 2006

Had a feeling it would turn out this way, I will just continue getting what I can physically carry on my yearly sojourn to Majorca. I seldom drink at home anyway so all I get is enough for me for Christmas. I much prefer the social atmosphere of the pub for having a few drinks.

  Totally-braindead 21:35 23 Nov 2006

I'm not surprised either, though since I'm scottish I don't have to pay tax is that right hijo?

  Forum Editor 00:10 24 Nov 2006

I would have come to the same decision, for several reasons:-

1. The UK has a serious alcohol-abuse problem. The number of alcohol-related deaths has almost doubled in the period 1991/2005, and anything which makes it easier/cheaper for people (particularly young people) to buy alcohol is not exactly a good idea.

2. Cigarette smoking is a known and serious health hazard, and one of the ways government can act to reduce tobacco consumption is by the imposition of high duty levels. Providing people with access to cheap supplies just doesn't make sense.

3. The tax revenue lost as a result would have to be clawed back, and this would mean non-drinkers subsidising the drinkers. Increased tax burdens already chill the blood of politicians looking to be re-elected, and European judges are equally averse to make judgments that result in higher levels of taxation across the board. Far better to maintain spending taxes/duties - the more you buy the more tax you pay.

4. Small retailers would suffer badly, particularly those corner shops which rely heavily on alcohol/tobacco sales to survive. In any other circumstance this forum would be ringing to the sound of people rushing to defend the small trader. Small shopkeepers all over the UK must be sleeping that little bit better tonight.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

OnePlus 5 review

Alice Saey's mesmerising animation for Dutch singer Mark Lotterman

iPad Pro 10.5in (2017) review

Comment booster votre iPhone ?