Potential purchase - opinions, please

  bruce 11:32 24 Mar 2003
Locked

Replacement for silver surfer, but with visiting gamer teen, so trying to keep the price down, but the spec up to at least middling.........
Any/all opinions welcomed.

P4 2.53Ghz, 512Mb DDR RAM, 80Gb 7200 HDD (Maxtor or Seagate), 1.44Mb FDD, CDRW (Liteon), DVD (various incl. Artec/Mercury), 64Mb GeForce4 MX440, Jetway P4X400DAP mobo with VIA P4X400 MCH & VT 8235, Socket 478, supports 533Mhz system bus in data transfer rate, 133/166/200MHz Memory clock frequency, DDR266/DDR333/DDR400 DDR Module, ATX form factor 4 layers, PCB size: 30.5x21.0, 5x32-bit PCI slot, 1xAGP - supports AGP 2.0 & 4X/8X mode. On-board sound, on-board LAN 10/100, ATA 133, USB 2.0 Port x 2 and Headers for 4x USB (9 PIN CLOSE), 56K Modem,
300W ATX Case.
£500.
Would then add 15" TFT eg AOC LM520 or Ilyama BX3814UT for @ £200.
Thanks.

  Spook Tooth 11:47 24 Mar 2003

Sounds like a bit of a bargain really, at £500 (inc?) plus another £200 for the monitor.

What I feel people would comment on was the relative benefits to be had in spending an extra £100 for a 17" TFT monitor (if TFT screen is what you require). The additional viewing size is really much better and the AOC monitor from overclockers.co.uk amongst others is a very good monitor (as Djohn would testify).

The other factor to note would be the graphics card. I have used it briefly and it is not really the best 3D graphics performer, though it does hold it's own for light usage. If looking for a budget solution, go for the MX600 instead, slightly more expensive but much better. Or, if you can stretch the budget a little further, go for the GF4 Titanium version, the '4200' (GF4 Ti4200) model which is really the gamer's graphics card, costs almost double the MX400 though at say £120 inc. It performs at double the ability of the former MX400 card also though, but is only really required if the system is going to get a lot of use gaming wise by a serious gamer, really. Only the latest most demanding games require such processing power - these are targeted more at the late teens/20/30 somethings (and Ordep ;o]).

Otherwise - a great system it seems. The P4 will run more silently than an AMD Athlon system, as it requires less cooling so perhaps a good choice, though Athlon systems are tradionally less expensive than Intel Pentium chips. A link to the computer might encourage more opinion - good luck all the same with it though.

  Paranoid Android 12:54 24 Mar 2003

Personally I would opt for a better graphics card (4600ti) and a decent flat screen 17in CRT display rather than a cheap TFT.

You probably don't need a 2.53 Gig processor either, you could save by opting for a 2.2 Celeron. More than enough poke for gaming, especially with a Ti graphics card.

(Now I am nitpicking)

Marvin.

  bruce 10:31 28 Mar 2003

I'm being offered an ATi Radeon 8500 R200A1D (64 MB DDR, TV, DVI) for an extra £20 instead of the 440MX (which is being defended as "an excellent card").

Any thoughts on the Radeon 8500, please ?

  Rayuk 18:17 28 Mar 2003

A view here may help click here

  Spook Tooth 18:53 28 Mar 2003

Sounds good to me - Ordep uses the same card (an avid gamesplayer and PCA postee). He has no gripes about its ability. £20 extra is very reasonable.

  bruce 19:38 28 Mar 2003

Thanks to all.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Alienware 17 R4 2017 review

Is this the future of VR and AR?

Best iPad buying guide 2017

Comment regarder le Bureau des Légendes en ligne ?