Hi all im in the proccess of buying one of these for £150 click hereIts 2 months old from a mate, i am not "Gend" up on the responce time thing so is this worth the money & is 3 MS responce time good or bad..?i dare say i would be playing some games..
Best I've seen to date is 2ms, so I wouldn't worry...:-)
stuartli thankx, is it the lower the responce rate the better.? or the higher.?
The lower the number the better.
Thankx stuartli..!!One VERY last question please, IS 1680x1050 optimal resolution any good cause ive been told its not HD but close.? & will it effect gameplay.?
Response time is the amount of time a pixel in an LCD monitor takes to go from black to white and back to black again.It is measured in milliseconds (ms).Lower numbers mean faster transitions and therefore fewer visible image artifactsThe time taken for this process varies, but tends to fall somewhere between 2 milliseconds and 5 millisecondsScreens with long response times will have problems refreshing every element in their pictures quick enough to keep up with fast motion, resulting in moving objects looking blurred or ‘ghosting’.With a response time of 3ms is very good most present day monitors are listed at 5msThe more expensive monitors will list a responses time of 2ms Even the fastest LCD screens can struggle to show really fast motion clearly.
Some guidance (best at present without too much effort!) about response times:click hereRe the optimal resolution. It's far higher than the 1152x864 I use for my 21in CRT monitor, on which Sky TV's on-line high definition transmissions are very sharp.In fact my monitor, coupled with a Twinhan Freeview PCI TV tuner, also provides very clear displays from the DTB source.
You will note a reference to GTG as well in the link I've provided.
MAny thankx ambra4 & stuartliThats whats throwing me, you say the lower the number MS is better but then in your link stuartli there is a top of the range monitor with 6 MS..? or is it 12..?
Maximum Resolution for a 22” widescreen is 1680x1050 and must be set to the correct resolution for the picture to look right nothing below or aboveIt no point buying the display and complaining afterwards that the picture look fat and stretch and you have a black band at the top and bottom of the display; like so many posting I have seen on this and other forum site So buy a new graphic card if your present card cannot display 1680 X 1050 Make sure you get the correct type AGP or PCI-e for your motherboardIf you don’t want to replace your display card buy a normal 22” square monitor not a widescreenMost flat panel monitors use a 60Hertz “Refresh Rate” any other setting you will get a “Out Of Range ErrorYou should uninstall the present monitor driver first, shut down the computer, and install the new display card if your present one need to be replaced, connect the LCD display to the new display card; power up the computer, access the bios if the present display card is on the motherboard and change the display setting from PCI to AGP or PCI-e save and reboot the computer Windows will load a temporary driver for the new display card; install the driver from the CD that came with the display card and set the resolution to1680x1050 and a Refresh Rate of 60Hertz
It was an older monitor model - it was the explanation of response times that was of value...:-)ambra4My quite ancient ATi 9550 graphics card can easily cope with 1680x1050 and, in fact, much higher resolutions.
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.
OnePlus 5 review
Alice Saey's mesmerising animation for Dutch singer Mark Lotterman
iPad Pro 10.5in (2017) review
Comment booster votre iPhone ?
© Copyright 2017 IDG UK. All Rights Reserved.