Looks like this has been resolved for me

  pj123 14:14 01 Dec 2003

so I will tick it. click here

  Diodorus Siculus 14:19 01 Dec 2003

What happened there?

  pj123 14:35 01 Dec 2003

I think the FE blocked it as it was getting out of hand. I am all in favour of the FE controlling the threads and stopping, deleting or blocking them as he sees fit. It would just be nice to have a message from the FE to that effect though.

  Diodorus Siculus 16:20 01 Dec 2003

Well, if it was closed, a posting saying why would be good.

  pj123 17:29 01 Dec 2003

Yes, I agree with you but I didn't close it, so I can't say why it was closed.

  Legolas 19:05 01 Dec 2003

Ah Big Brother is alive and well.

  pj123 14:06 02 Dec 2003

Yes, in the shape of FE. I would still like to know why though. Doesn't seem to be anything controversial on the original thread to me.

  Djohn 16:03 02 Dec 2003

Fourth post down wandered off the track and could be construed as liable unless proved beyond doubt. j.

  Salinger 16:08 02 Dec 2003

If it was construed as libellous, it would have been easier to delete that post without locking the thread.

  Djohn 16:13 02 Dec 2003

Good point.Only FE can tell pj in the end as to why it was locked, but maybe because it was wandering off subject, only a guess. j.

  Belatucadrus 17:10 02 Dec 2003

Not meant to be libellous, more a question, I haven't been to Sheffield for nearly twenty years and back then there was a pub of the same name that reputedly appealed to a certain clientele. I was just surprised to see that this appeared to still be the case. If it caused any offence let FE know, I have no objection to it being pulled. As has already been stated definitely a bit off topic.

This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.

Elsewhere on IDG sites

Best phone camera 2017

Stunning new film posters by Hattie Stewart, Joe Cruz & more

iPad Pro 10.5in (2017) review

28 astuces pour profiter au mieux de votre iPhone