Thanks Alan. I know you get what you pay for but it was the review statement that scanning at 96 dpi somehow translated to 400 dpi for a 10x8 print. Scanning at 96 dpi would produce abstract pictures at 10x8. Anyway you confirm the much more sensible 5 Mp resolution.
because it appears regularly in the 'Reader Offer 'ads in the national press and the likes of Maplin also offer it. I guess naming it a 'Scanner' is the misnomer Slide viewer is better - but at the price a proper 'scanner with slide/negative facility would be a better purchase.
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.