Galaxy Note 8 vs iPhone X
Which one is the better long term value? The AMD is about £75 cheaper; £136 v £212, which is very good value. Looking at cpu charts the I7 outperforms it in most applications but not by lots and overall its quite close.
I want to build a new pc which will need to last me for 3-5 years. I will use it for everything, including video encoding and games. The AMD runs at a much higher frequency though, 3.4ghz v 2.66ghz. How well do these processors overclock? This will be important as I will be looking to do this about 2-3 years into its life. I was dead set on the AMD but if I'm going to run the pc for the next 5 years would the I7 be a better choice?
the AMD will be a much cheaper system! and AMD tend to use the same socket type for many years whereas intel change it every week!
i went for the i7 920 tho, i often encode DVDs and its easily capable of 4GHz on each core, and its triple channel ram provides amazing bandwidth for encoding video
anandtech have good comparison charts,
fyi, in jan 2010 i paid £200 for my CPU, £130 for 6GB ram [good ram] and 140 for the motherboard
I think I will go for the AMD. I'm looking to spend £1000 which includes a decent 23" TFT monitor. I forgot about the motherboards, for the I7 you need to spend £150+, for the AMD a decent one is only £80.
if you wanna spend under £1000 then yes the AMD is best
This is the system I am thinking of getting, parts are all from ebuyer. Have I missed anything apart from the the operating system? Anyone have any comments or advice about any of the components?
Only thing I can think of is whether I should spend £186 on the 300gb raptor hard drive or get a standard sata II drive instead. Reason why I want a raptor drive is because I find that the hard drive is always the bottleneck for system performance especially for older machines.
For example, I find my pc struggling sometimes even though the cpu usage is at say 25% and there is still 1.5gb of ram available. I can tell too because you can hear the hard drive gurgling! Its a sata 1 drive, maxtor, 7200rpm, 16mb cache but its 5 years old.
CPU; AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.4GHz Socket AM3 8MB L3 Cache 125W Retail Box Processor, £136.95, 186428 (ebuyer code)
Motherboard; Asus M4A785TD-V EVO 785G Socket AM3 onboard DVI VGA HDMI 8 channel audio ATX Motherboard, £67.50, 169532
Graphics card; Sapphire HD 5770 1GB GDDR5 Dual DVI HDMI DisplayPort HDCP PCI-E Graphics Card, £133.54, 189741
RAM; Kingston 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 1600MHz/PC3-12800 HyperX Memory Kit CL9(9-9-9-27), £90.17, 169240
PSU; Corsair 650W TX Series PSU - 120mm Fan, 80+% Efficiency, Single +12V Rail, £71.96, 135514
Case; Coolermaster Sileo Quiet Case With 500W Extreme Power Plus PSU *Special Offer Bundle*, £79.99, 167439
Hard drive; Western Digital WD3000HLFS 300GB Hard Drive SATAII 10000rpm 16MB Cache - OEM WD VelociRaptor, £181.79, 149435
Monitor; Philips 230C1HSB 23" Full HD LCD Monitor 1920x1080 12000:1 (Dynamic) 300cd/m2 2ms VGA/DVI-D/HDMI/USB Multimedia Glossy Black, £156.13, 161787
Keyboard; Microsoft Wireless Laser Desktop 5000 - USB, £24.99, 128028
DVD drive x 2; Samsung SH-S223 22X DVD±RW/RAM/DL Serial ATA Black Bare Drive - OEM, £14.99, 145450
Speakers; Logitech X-210 Speakers - 2.1 Channel 25W RMS, £25, 94472
It all works out at £998 + about £80 for windows 7 so just slightly over budget.
Hard drive is £181.79, not £186
An SSD isn't within your budget so rather than a Velociraptor get a Samsung F3 1TB which is faster and 3 times bigger. In fact get 3 for less than the cost of a single Raptor.
the VR is better than the samsung F3
i have a 300GB VR, i dont think id pay 180 for a hard disk tho, [i got mine for £100] id probaly buy an SSD and 1.5TB hdd
Thanks for that, I may just go for one of those and save loads
This thread is now locked and can not be replied to.